Search for: "In re: AT&T Intellectual Property II"
Results 221 - 240
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 11:27 am
Article II.7(5) is the provision on how ISDS applies to intellectual property issues, it reads: The Article does not apply to the issuance of compulsory licenses granted in relation to intellectual property rights in accordance with the TRIPS Agreement, or to the revocation, limitation, or creation of intellectual property rights, to the extent that such issuance, revocation, limitation, or creation is consistent with Chapter QQ._… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:32 am
Blog by Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO Michelle K. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:05 am
” UTSA § 1(2)(ii)(B)(II). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
This time, the floor goes to nothing less than EPO's EmperorPresident Monsieur Benoît Battistelli.* BREAKING NEWS: UK Government issues statement on EPOJeremy has just received a communication from a spokesman for the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:39 am
Woodstock For years I’ve been kvetching here about the phenomenon of municipal overreach on intellectual property claims, whether it’s catchphrases with no particular geographic association; transit line symbols that do convey meaning but when licensed don’t convey meaningful claims of endorsement or affiliation; skyline features that belong to no one; or municipal seals that the Lanham Act simply says ain’t trademarks. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
The brief is on behalf of 27 intellectual property law and constitutional law professors: Jack Balkin (Yale Law School) Barton Beebe (NYU School of Law) Stacey L. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
“Because we knew those rights are already gone, they’re with Spielberg, and secondly we found a way to do it where we didn’t have to ask for permission, because with those rights came a certain collaboration. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
EFF’s Intellectual Property Director Corynne McSherry kicked off the event, helping to remind us that only a few short months ago the FCC proposed a set of rules that would have given Internet providers clearance to charge websites to reach users faster. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm
Autolytic debridement – For bed sore patients, autolysis uses the body’s own enzymes and moisture to re-hydrate, soften and finally liquefy hard eschar and slough; this is a selective process – only necrotic tissue is liquefied and is virtually painless to the patient. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:33 pm
Incidentally, all four lectures used the same PowerPoint frames, which you can access here.So what then is the Big Picture of intellectual property to which the title of these lectures alluded? [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:56 pm
If you’re in the Bay Area, we invite you to join us on November 20 at San Francisco City Hall. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:06 am
Noriega’s likeness is used in the videogame Call of Duty: Black Ops II, published by Activision. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
-- ok, I stop it here).* You don't have to be small: IPEC keeps case for itself- plus UPDATEThe cost-capped, damages-capped Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) in England and Wales is designed for use by small and medium-sized claimants and has a small claims track. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
* France to Modify its Intellectual Property Code. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
On Sunday 19 October the IPKat launched a snap competition to compose a limerick that (i) begins with the line "A talented kitten called Kate" and (ii) is on the theme of intellectual property protection other than via the patent system. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Questions and possible answers are in this inspiring post.* Another competition -- this time for the literary minded Jeremy launches a competition to write a limerick that (i) begins with the line "A talented kitten called Kate" and (ii) is on the theme of intellectual property protection other than via the patent system. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
CEO: You’re sure? [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:11 am
See, for example, Godaddy’s Intellectual Property Policy. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
********************************* In our June 4, 2014 article on cyber security and cyber governance[i] we noted that for many reasons, boards of directors and executives of U.S. companies needed to reexamine how they protect (and respond to the successful hacking of) their most critical intellectual property and customer information. [read post]
