Search for: "In re N.C.1"
Results 221 - 240
of 538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
Alston, 310 N.C. 399, 407 (1984). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
’Id., subd. 1(a)(1). [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:03 am
GS 7B-403; 7B-805; 7B-807(a); In re E.H., 227 N.C. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:08 pm
In In re Stedman, 305 N.C. 92 (1982), fingerprints were taken unlawfully from a juvenile because he had been indicted and arrested instead of first being tried in juvenile court (he was under 16 years old when the offense was committed). [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 pm
N.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Published: 1. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
The above procedure was the one used in the O.J. case, resulting in a reported opinion bearing the writer’s name, In re McKinny, 462 S.E.2d 530 (N.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
§ 1A-1, Rule 9(j). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
App. 350 (2012) (discussed here), and In re McClain, 226 N.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
App. 350 (2012) (discussed here), and In re McClain, 226 N.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 1:45 pm
Of course, if the General Assembly doesn’t approve of the outcome in Turner, it can re-write G.S. 15-1 to carry out its intent for future cases. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 1:45 pm
Of course, if the General Assembly doesn’t approve of the outcome in Turner, it can re-write G.S. 15-1 to carry out its intent for future cases. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:12 am
This is just what the federal courts are supposed to do when constitutional rights are at stake: hold the government’s feet to the fire, and demand that they demonstrate that have a damned good reason for doing what they’re doing. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:44 pm
Lawrence, 197 N.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:44 pm
Lawrence, 197 N.C. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:47 pm
See In re G.D.H., No. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See also In re Kearney, 174 N.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
See also In re Kearney, 174 N.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
N.C.) lays them out well; see also David Post’s blog post on the case, published after the North Carolina decision came down. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
It’s been a fun ride, but we’re becoming increasingly aware that our profligate use of electrons cannot continue indefinitely. [read post]
