Search for: "In re 2012 Legislative Districting of the State" Results 221 - 240 of 833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2018, 8:58 am by Florian Mueller
For the fourth time in six years (minus a few months), Apple and Samsung will square off again, starting today, in the San Jose building of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:52 am by Lisa Baird
District Court for the Central District of California, seeking a declaration that an Office of Inspector General (OIG) Special Fraud Alert on physician-owned distributors (PODs) unfairly and unconstitutionally burdens First Amendment rights of free speech and due process. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:19 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
Sebelius Injunction In April, the United States District Court for Arizona certified a class of Medicare beneficiaries and enjoined CMS from putting recovery claims into collections while pending a waiver or compromise request. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm by Steve Hall
John Harms of Scottsbluff, noting that two of the state's death-row inmates — both of whom killed children — are from his district. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 4:03 am by Michael Boyd
Panetta was a lawsuit filed in 2012 challenging the targeted drone killings by the United States of three U.S. citizens in Yemen. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:27 am by Jon Gelman
Participants enrolled in the World Trade Center Health Program for treatment currently reside in all 50 states and in 429 of the 435 Congressional Districts in the country. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:24 pm
[Federal Judge Jacqueline] Nguyen of Central District Court in California found this last provision, which would allow for royalties to be collected on sales that take place in other states, overreaching in a way that invalidates the entire law. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:04 pm by News Desk
” Kelsch represented the Mandan House District for 21 years, from 1991 to 2012. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
Otherwise, for a complete list of environmental legislation this session (click here). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am by MBettman
The Second District Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in a split decision, finding that the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Eighth Amendment analysis in In re C.P. was inapplicable to Blankenship because Blankenship was not a juvenile when he committed the sexual offense. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Todd Presnell
District Court for the District of Columbia, August 10, 2012. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Todd Presnell
District Court for the District of Columbia, August 10, 2012. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am by MBettman
In re Agler, 19 Ohio St.2d 70 (1969) (A juvenile’s right to juvenile courts and proceedings are not fundamental in nature, but instead are legislative creations.) [read post]