Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 9" Results 221 - 240 of 862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2020, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
Where grounds for recusal of trial judge would arise only during sentencing (if at all), defendant was not entitled to writ of mandamus ordering recusal from trial In Re: John Moore, 955 F.3d 384 (April 9, 2020). [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:58 am by Dennis Crouch
However, on petition from the USPTO, the court has now re-designated the decision as precedential. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
In response to the motion, the Petitioning Creditors argued that, because terms that they wanted included in the settlement agreement were mentioned in their initial proposal by email on July 20, 2019 (i.e., six days before the July 26 email exchanges discussed above), and Tagnetics (allegedly) did not dispute those terms, such terms were accepted and the parties’ subsequent negotiations only concerned an acceptable payment schedule. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:54 pm by C. Ryan Maloney, Esq.
  However, the landlord’s claim will be treated as pre-petition unsecured claim sharing pro rata with other general unsecured creditors. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:54 pm by C. Ryan Maloney, Esq.
  However, the landlord’s claim will be treated as pre-petition unsecured claim sharing pro rata with other general unsecured creditors. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:54 pm by C. Ryan Maloney, Esq.
  However, the landlord’s claim will be treated as pre-petition unsecured claim sharing pro rata with other general unsecured creditors. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:35 am by John B. Palley
That means if you do something wrong in your initial petition for letters at your first court date the Judge will delay you three months until another court date. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
This means that USCIS must continue to accept renewal applications for DACA on a nationwide basis. 9. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Ed. note: This week, the Eighth Circuit denied an IJ petition to rehear the case en banc.] [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
Along with their petitions, the Debtors filed the declaration of Robert D. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am by Jonathan Holbrook
Although a surety is permitted to file such a motion under the statute, it is a legal document and petition for use in court and therefore filing it constitutes the practice of law. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:29 am by Robert Loeb, Katie Kopp, Melanie Hallums
First Circuit: Oral arguments scheduled for Apr. 6 through Apr. 9, 2020 are canceled. [read post]