Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 221 - 240
of 533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2016, 10:57 am
As co-blogger Jonathan H. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:19 am
“What you want is for us to tell you how as a judicial nominee we’re going to rule on the important issues you find vexing,” she told the audience at ASU Gammage on Monday night. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:32 am
Tim Kaine (as reported in The Hill): “If these guys think guys think they are going to stonewall the filling of that vacancy, or other vacancies, then a Democratic Senate majority will say we’re not going to let you thwart the law,” he told The Huffington Post. [read post]
8 May 2016, 5:26 pm
If they’re wrong, rebut them. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 9:38 am
And if we're going to have something of a wall -- and Mexico is not going to pay for it -- wouldn't it be a consolation if the "wall" could pay for itself? [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
"[O]h and nobody buy [stock in] Stoam. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
They just don’t buy their artificially cramped understanding of how to figure out what the law is. . . . if you’re trying to make sense of a statute, the question for an interpreter is what Congress meant to communicate by the words that it chose. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:24 pm
As Richard Re notes over at Prawfsblawg, the Chief Justice often cites academic articles from law reviews in his opinions on the Court. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:09 pm
If Chevron were reversed, how does that affect what you're talking about here? [read post]
27 May 2022, 8:50 am
So, we're going to experiment with offering some. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 5:54 am
The writer H. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 3:39 pm
But the NYT has given “Shattered,” by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, the dignity of a Michiko Kakutani review, and I will read that. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:43 am
(lunch will be provided) Where: Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, ASU, Willard H. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
[An assessment of claims that Justice Alito's draft opinion rests on historical error, provides no meaningful basis for distinguishing abortion from other unenumerated rights, and forecloses constitutional protection of the mother's life.] [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:56 pm
The first was Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman in Procaps S.A. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:08 am
” Couric then asked, “But when it comes to these football players, you may find their actions offensive, but what you’re saying is, it’s within their rights to exercise those actions? [read post]
7 May 2016, 5:19 pm
We’re fine with people who don’t look like us, as long as they think like us. . . . [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:52 pm
Chief Judge Sutton summarized the issue in In re: Juntoff as follows: In passing the Affordable Care Act, Congress created a "Shared Responsibility Payment" for individuals who did not purchase qualifying individual health insurance plans. [read post]
