Search for: "In re O. T."
Results 221 - 240
of 12,685
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
— intention du législateur — critère de nécessité — application de l’arrêt R. c. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
"Don’t miss one of the “Top 10” weirdest movies of 2023, according to Giles Edwards of 366 Weird Movies, who graciously wrote:“Every single second is bursting with life from [Scott Bateman’s] augmentations, be it kinetic line-o-grams or the overtly Gilliam-esque animations utilizing black-and-white photographs of older “space aliens” …. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Other teams without the Larry O’Brien Championship Trophy include the Indiana Pacers, Charlotte Hornets, and Phoenix Suns. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:19 am
If you dread these issues, you’re also not alone. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
The writer is expressing contempt for women if they glam up and if they don't. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Arizona – Why Arizonans Can’t See Gov. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” And, “Weber expressly instructed customers who were re-selling their slicers to transfer their operating manuals to purchasing third parties. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
[Keisler and Bernstein contradicted Luttig's position.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
Veilleux, 2023 QCCDPHA 60 [1] Le 20 décembre 2021, l’Hôpital Fleurimont transmet deux ordonnances à la pharmacie où travaille l’intimée. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:53 am
But since senior judges on the Ninth Circuit aren't allowed to vote on en banc calls in the first place (even though they're invited to express their views internally, if they wish), I probably wouldn't have them publish something that simply says -- as Judge O'Scannlain does here -- that in a universe in which they had a vote, they'd have voted for en banc review. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:20 am
That agreement allowed elections in the city to resume after 12 years, but only by essentially re-dividing it between the parties who split it to begin with. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
Justice Jackson, for example, emphasized the difference between the language in Section 11 of the Securities Act and the language in Rule 10b-5, opining: “When you’re required to state something and you don’t state it, Section 11 says there’s liability. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:16 pm
In the case of In re Danna T., the Suffolk County Family Court deliberated over a petition filed by E.O., the maternal grandmother of G.D., seeking visitation rights. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
And the court’s language should be open enough to ensure that we don’t have re-ossification of the law. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
La juge de première instance a rejeté la requête en rejet du chef d’accusation présentée par l’appelante, qui invoquait la préclusion découlant d’une question déjà tranchée et la règle du stare decisis horizontal dans la mesure où, en février 2020, elle avait été acquittée sous la même accusation. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
They’re machine-made goods. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Religious freedom cases—judges seem to take joy in being amateur theologians; do you see judges evidencing joy in aesthetic evaluations w/o admitting they do so. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Courts don’t think they’re violating the 1A—Schedule A defendant cases, same set of problems. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
That is, TM infringement is a harm to the TM owner; harm to consumers isn’t necessary so it doesn’t matter if they’re tossing without thought; but if they don’t care enough to clarify ambiguities, then there shouldn’t be a consumer claim. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:34 am
” In re Marriage of Byrne, 179 Ill. [read post]
