Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Criminal Practice"
Results 221 - 240
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2017, 1:15 pm
Supreme Court nine times. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:24 am
The Supreme Court vacated the decision of the lower court and ordered the admission of newly discovered evidence, including the testimonial evidence of two other co-accused in the same case, both of whom gave testimony exonerating Lara and Licayan from culpability. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
A philosophy of practicality As a justice, Breyer’s demeanor and questions during oral arguments often conjured up comparisons to an absent-minded professor. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In In re Grant, the Supreme Court of California court disbarred a lawyer who pled guilty to a felony count of possession of child pornography. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
(I won’t focus on claims that the Fourth Circuit’s decision is contrary to Supreme Court precedent such as Parker v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
Nixon before the Supreme Court, described the history in a declaration filed with our petition: we were aware that the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over possible impeachments, was conducting an inquiry into whether President Nixon had committed “high crimes and misdemeanors” and thus was liable to impeachment. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:52 am
There were more than 400 criminal law standard memoranda alone. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
We're asking the Ohio Supreme Court to review the decision upholding it.A few weeks ago, Patrick Kabat (Chandra Law), Carolyn Allen, and I filed an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, asking it to agree to review a very interesting -- and, in my view, troubling -- Ohio Court of Appeals decision. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, it would mean four women would simultaneously serve for the first time in its 233-year history, as close to gender parity as possible on the nine-person bench. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 2:30 pm
District court: The law is unconstitutional under Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court to intervene. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:53 pm
A whopping 23 years ago almost to the day, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case called Reno v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
. : University Press of Kansas, c2010.Appellate Advocacy(RES) KF251 .B42 2010A practical guide to appellate advocacy / Mary Beth Beazley.Beazley, Mary Beth, 1957-Austin [Tex.] : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business ; New York : Aspen Publishers, c2010.BankruptcyKF1524 .C4194 2010Chapter 7 consumer bankruptcy strategies : leading lawyers on preparing a chapter 7 filing, establishing effective client strategies, and understanding recent trends. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
The UK Human Rights blog reports: Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, in his dissent in Professor Anastaplo’s case seeking admission to the Illinois Bar (In Re Anastaplo 1961—which Anastaplo lost 5-4), vigorously defended Anastaplo’s position on first amendment grounds and asserted, among other things, that “we must not be afraid to be free”—Justice Black arranged for this quote, and others from his dissent, to be read at his funeral. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Cameras in Court: the Crime and Courts Bill The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) this week published its report on the Crime and Courts Bill which (among other things) allows for the use of television cameras in courts other than the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Circuit, to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the death of Antonin Scalia. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
The UK Supreme Court held in Rhodes that the author of a book owes no duty to avoid causing distress to a potential reader of the book. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
The UK Supreme Court held in Rhodes that the author of a book owes no duty to avoid causing distress to a potential reader of the book. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, in his dissent in Professor Anastaplo’s Supreme Court case seeking admission to the Illinois Bar (In Re Anastaplo 1961—which Anastaplo lost 5-4), vigorously defended Anastaplo’s position on first amendment grounds and asserted, among other things, that “we must not be afraid to be free”—Justice Black arranged for this quote, and others from his dissent, to… [read post]
