Search for: "In re the Dependency of R. B."
Results 221 - 240
of 1,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2021, 8:39 am
5(2)(b) and Art. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
If you want to read the decision in full, consider using the pdf version. )Reasons for the Decision[The following text has been taken verbatim from part B of the Enlarged Board's communication of 22 October 2019 annexed to the summons to oral proceedings.]1. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 3:17 pm
I've read and re-read Justice Kennedy's opinion in Lukumi, and it is not there. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am
(b) Where the original intention is not immediately apparent, the requester bears the burden of proof, which must be a heavy one (J 8/80, loc.cit., Reasons No. 6). [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:17 am
In addition, such an opt out tends to compartmentalize markets, allowing total price freedom and therefore authorizes different prices depending on the areas. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
”26 As the court succinctly stated, “the discoverability of a communication depends on its nature, rather than its source. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm
/Kenneth R. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:24 am
Dependent care benefits. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Rule 506(b) prohibits the use of “general advertising or general solicitation. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 12:00 pm
Res. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:26 pm
R. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Daniel B. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:28 am
(ii) EBA members are appointed by the Administrative Council, but only for a five year period, and their re-appointment again depends on the AC’s consent and goodwill. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” So if Remedy A would trigger a very complicated and close severability analysis and Remedy B would trigger an easy and obvious severability analysis, this distinction itself provides reason to prefer Remedy B.In the ACA context, at least upon superficial analysis, Remedy B (enjoining the 2017 tax repeal) wouldn’t seem to raise a difficult question at all; the tax-zeroing provision appears conceptually and functionally disjoined from other provisions of the TCJA, and… [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:42 pm
Res. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
Not necessarily, depending on what is required to start the code operating. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Codified in §102(b). [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm
Your body is still fighting it, but you’re no longer showing it. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
[B.] [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
In the 2014 case of Halliburton II, the Supreme Court re-affirmed the Basic v. [read post]
