Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Dissenting Opinion)"
Results 221 - 240
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that Justice “Clarence Thomas, the court’s only African American, filed a furious dissent, dismissing the ruling as a feel-good exercise that pandered to media interest in the case and exhibited its own bias—against state courts in the South. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
I’ll do my best to keep this as brief as possible, since the opinion and dissent are quite long. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
He also argued that, even if plaintiff's interests in the entities were non-marital, they were still relevant under Domestic Relations Law s 236(5)(d)(9), which requires the court, in determining equitable distribution, to consider "the probable future financial circumstances of each party . [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:01 am
I’m afraid one of my biggest criticisms of this book is rather fuzzy: that is to say, in my opinion this book lacks “background music. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
Kuchta, Slip Opinion No. 2014-Ohio-4275. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Drymer, Indirect Expropriation Oscar M. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:32 am
I’m not sure I buy into that. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:04 pm
Anything that reduces claims frequency associated with routine corporate transactions such as M&A activity is all to the good as well, particularly where the case that the litigation serves to protect the interests of committed shareholders is less than compelling. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 8:24 am
I'd of course be glad to post or link to responses to this as well. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
” For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “[t]he court’s opinion by Justice Neil M. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:48 am
An interesting July 3, 2012 Ohio Supreme Court opinion (here) highlights the critical distinction between advancement and indemnification and examines the circumstances under which directors are entitled to advancement. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
The opinion is here. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 10:02 pm
I have witnessed FSIS managers exclude employees from productive work because it is easier to avoid a dissenting opinion than to consider it. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Here's part of what I wrote at the time adding a word I'd left out and quoting Stephanopolis. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 11:51 am
This time I focused on an area of both professional and personal interest, the history of the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
If you’d like a detailed overview of the exception, check out this 1994 article from the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:28 am
I’m interested in focusing on the Article 8 privacy claims, though, so won’t be saying anything further about the others. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
view of what best serves the Court's institutional interest. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:23 pm
Eleanor M. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
"Justice Sims dissents in part, and agrees that there was no abuse of discretion in denying probation but dissents from imposition of the upper term, stating that the latter "shocks my conscience. [read post]
