Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm
Graham v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am
Graham told the New York Times earlier this week. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Originally published on Feb. 28, 2021; updated on Apr. 9, 2022. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Words matter. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:02 pm
The original may be accessed HERE; another HERE (which includes the original Chinese).It follows below:Credits: This translation was produced by Rogier Creemers and Graham Webster on the basis of DigiChina's earlier translation of the of the second review draft of the law, which in turn was based on our translation of the first draft, produced by Rogier Creemers, Mingli Shi, Lauren Dudley, and Graham Webster. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Why should the subjective intentions of the framers (or ratifiers) matter, when they enacted only the text? [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Well, Senator Graham had a completely bonkers reaction. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
Tariff and Duty Risks on Products from China Keep Rising In Importing From China (Directly OR Indirectly) has Big RETROACTIVE Risks, one of our international trade lawyers (who was at the time working on a massive case involving illegal transshipment that eventually led to a U.S. company having to pay the U.S. government $62.5 million, from which our clients got a good chunk), warned about the duty risks on China products: If you are importing product originally from China covered by or even… [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:29 am
Congrats, associates! [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 11:17 am
In our initial post, Russia’s War Will Impact Your China Business, we talked about why there would be an impact. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:07 am
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, bypassed the quorum requirement and gaveled Barrett forward to the full Senate anyway. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 5:07 am
(See my post with Alan Graham on this subject.) 10. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
Strand 4 involves the creation of new and reformed criminal offences that would apply directly to users, in parallel with the government’s proposals for an online duty of care, the Law Commission has been conducting two projects looking at the criminal law as it affects online and other communications: Modernising Communications Offences (Law Com No 399, 21 July 2021); Hate Crime Laws (LawCom No 402, 7 December 2021). [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
Strand 4 involves the creation of new and reformed criminal offences that would apply directly to users, in parallel with the government’s proposals for an online duty of care, the Law Commission has been conducting two projects looking at the criminal law as it affects online and other communications: Modernising Communications Offences (Law Com No 399, 21 July 2021); Hate Crime Laws (LawCom No 402, 7 December 2021). [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm
The most heavily debated aspect of the government’s proposals has been, Strand 2, the ‘legal but harmful content’ duty. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) (prohibiting the juvenile death penalty); Graham v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Further, the defendant’s conduct throughout the litigation process indicated that these proceedings are unlikely to end the matter, and the claimant was therefore “entitled to an award of damages that signals the defendant’s allegations against her are false” [30.10]. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 5:37 am
Lindsey Graham, R-SC, and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 5:19 am
The appellate court, however, seized upon the rationale behind Graham v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:04 am
Not that it would matter, as either criticism would still be protected under Emerson's firm promises to protect freedom of expression, which make no exception for speech others view as hateful. [read post]
