Search for: "In the Matter of Decker"
Results 221 - 234
of 234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2008, 8:52 am
Johnson has expertise in unfair competition and domain name disputes, and has been involved in domestic and international trademark matters for Fortune 500 ® companies. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 11:27 am
Double-decker buses, the whole bit. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:15 pm
DO NOT take those horrifying double-decker tourist buses. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 4:19 am
Black & Decker, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Deckers Outdoor Corp., 259 F.3d 1101, 1109 (9th Cir. 2001); Patel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
" In the Matter of Carter, Carter v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:41 pm
" Now, Arizona is gearing up for its first execution in nearly seven years.The Arizona Supreme Court has been asked to issue an execution warrant and is expected to take up the matter on April 17, said Andrea Esquer, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Terry Goddard. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 11:40 pm
Patent No. 4,988,515, "Cardioplegic solution"); failure to comply with the requirements of the Bayh-Dole Act (and the government's discretionary authority to take title to a patent); invalidation of a certificate of correction for impermissible broadening; use of the word "about" in claims for claim construction purposes; inequitable conduct defense and failure to plead it with requisite particularity; invalidity defense and failure to plead it with clear and convincing… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 4:14 am
Black & Decker Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 1:42 pm
Divers were in the water in case anyone fell in - you would last only a matter of minutes in waters of this temperature. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:48 am
Black & Decker Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:15 pm
(TTABlogged here).In re The Black & Decker Corp., Serial No. 76570453 (December 28, 2006) [precedential]. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 4:16 pm
That the officers later learned Lemieux had entered his own abode is of no moment: "what matters is their reasonable belief" that a burglary was in progress or had recently occurred at the time of the entry. [read post]
