Search for: "In the Matter of Faith A. F."
Results 221 - 240
of 2,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2009, 4:18 am
Medtronic, Inc., 678 F. 2d 93, 94-95 (9th Cir. 1982)). [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:20 am
Schwartzman is the Edward F. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
The converse of this rule is that, as a general matter, an LPR that does not meet any of these six criteria does not seek admission upon her retur [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:03 pm
William F. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:42 pm
International Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180, 195 (8th Cir. 1976). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Tambrands, Inc., 841 F. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an opportunity "to… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an opportunity "to… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an opportunity "to… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an opportunity "to… [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
Wells Lamont Corp., 494 F.2d 490, 493 (5th Cir. 1974) and McClure, 460 F.2d at 558). [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
But there was no case suggesting that even more would be necessary – for a forensic search of a phone at the border or, indeed, for any border search, no matter how nonroutine or invasive. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
" Miller, 240 F.3d at 400 (quoting Diorinou, 237 F.3d at 142). [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:58 am
Or, where a plaintiff (or a defendant, for that matter) loses the product in question, (e)(2)(B) should allow the court to bar any pre-loss expert report without a showing of bad faith. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
., 580 F.3d 1240, 91 USPQ2d 1938, (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm
From guest blogger, Thomas F. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 6:05 am
Even if he minimizes the value of advertising and puts most of his faith in free media — funny that the Trump-hating media won't just cut him off — shouldn't he do a little more advertising than that? [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:13 am
Servs., Inc., ___ F. 3d ___, 2008 WL 383060, *1 (2d Cir. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
f. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:40 pm
Portec, Inc., 970 F.2d 816, 826 (Fed. [read post]