Search for: "In the Matter of United States of America, Petitioner,"
Results 221 - 240
of 382
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am
JULIO CESAR CHAVARRIA, Petitioner-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
NFAP surmised that the increased rate of denials has resulted in harming the competitiveness of US employers and has discouraged companies from bringing new business and jobs into the United States.[4] According to NFAP’s executive summary: [t]he evidence indicates adjudicators or others at U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:37 pm
Procedural HistoryUltimatePointer, L.L.C “filed two complaints in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas… alleged that Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc., and several retailers that sell Nintendo products, infringe[d] the [U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
The Center for Civic Mediation and LA County Bar are presenting a program tonight on the law of arbitration: "Will California Arbitration Law Survive the United States Supreme Court?" [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:17 am
AAO found that the beneficiary has been given significant discretion in decision-making, working closely with the parent company’s executives in determining the direction of the business in the United States and the Americas. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:17 am
AAO found that the beneficiary has been given significant discretion in decision-making, working closely with the parent company’s executives in determining the direction of the business in the United States and the Americas. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
” The article concludes that both a law degree and experience matter. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
In any event, argues the United States, habeas is an inappropriate mechanism for attacking such conditions. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., DELTA/UNITED SPECIALTIES, INC., ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., BRADLEY MASONRY, INC., ET AL., Appellees. 1st District.Attorneys -- Attorney's fees contract -- Trial court erred in denying petition for approval of a straight 40% contingency fee contract for representation of petitioner in a medical malpractice action -- Trial court is required by rule to approve petition as long as it finds that petitioner understood the rights that she was waiving and the terms of the… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am
The focus of the case is location – and, what is meant by an "offer to sell . . . within the United States" under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
AIA Sec. 18 recites as follows: (C) A petitioner in a transitional proceeding who challenges the validity of 1 or more claims in a covered business method patent on a ground raised under section 102 or 103 of title 35, United States Code, as in effect on the day before the effective date set forth in section 3(n)(1), may support such ground only on the basis of– (i) prior art that is described by section 102(a) of such title of such title (as in effect on the day… [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
