Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. J. D." Results 221 - 240 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
Arizona has introduced legislation to allow non-licensed practitioners of homeopathy and nutrition to offer health care services.However, there are concerns about use of the title "homeopathic doctor" and which group of  practitioners can claim the title. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
In this view of the matter, it has become imperative to examine what are the contours of the public interest litigation? [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29]  In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30]  The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31]  After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking to vacate the… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those cases were Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy D[28] and Matter of Adoption of D.M.J.[29]  In Baby Boy D, the father was a member of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the mother was a non-Indian.[30]  The mother consented to adoption of Baby Boy D and the child was adopted without notice to the father and without his consent.[31]  After learning that the child had been adopted, the father filed a petition seeking to vacate the… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am by Eoin Daly
The citizen’s religious freedom claim does not depend on validation by an external authority: “a secular court cannot possibly choose in matters of this kind …can the State be prescriptive as to what shall be orthodox or conventional in such matters” [para 29]. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:38 am by FDABlog HPM
  The letter, signed by Senators Kay Hagan (D-NC), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Michael Enzi (R-WY), and John Kerry (D-MA), raises the same two issues some House members – the principal authors of the BPCIA – raised in a December 2010 letter to FDA. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:58 am by Scott A. McKeown
 § 1337 (d)(1) was akin to the factors enumerated in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm by Adam Thierer
Wow, what a year for cyberlaw and information technology policy books! [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Ickes, a panel of the court reversed the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, finding that a defect in their sidewalk was not so obviously trivial as a matter of law to allow for a dismissal o [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am by Steven M. Taber
The State explained that the IPCC – and therefore the EPA – relied on flawed science to conclude that greenhouse emissions endanger public health and welfare. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
MORGAN d/b/a SAINTS & SCHOLARS TATTOOS, Appellee. 2nd District.Insurance -- Automobile -- Appraisal -- Attorney's fees -- Where insurer demanded appraisal of stolen vehicle, and insured failed to comply with appraisal clause but filed suit prematurely, insured was not entitled to award of attorney's fees for that phase of trial court proceedings - [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:52 am
Adopting the 'poignant descriptive words' of Munby J (as he then was) in Re D (Intractable Contact Dispute: Publicity) [2004] 1 FLR 1226, His Honour Judge Clifford Bellamy began his judgment in Warwickshire County Council v TE & Ors [2010] EWHC B19 yesterday as follows:"On 21 July 2010 a wholly deserving father left my court in tears having been driven to abandon his battle to implement an order which I had made on 4th January 2010 that his son, S, now aged 12,… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
In June, 2000 the two embarked on a plan which would eventually close the publicly operated sites for juvenile offenders sentenced in Judge Ciavarella’s court, to send them to facilities which were privately owned and operated by Robert J. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
“If allowed to stand, the injunction would encourage courts to use vague public nuisance standards to scuttle the nation’s carefully created system for accommodating the need for energy production and the need for clean air,” appeals court Judge J. [read post]