Search for: "Insurance Company v. Haven" Results 221 - 240 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Destefano, No. 07-1428Title VII/Whether municipalities may decline to certify results of an exam that would make disproportionately more white applicants eligible for promotion than minority applicants, due to fears that certifying the results would lead to charges of racial discrimination.* SCOTUS docket here* Noted here: Business Insurance; Adjunct Law Prof; New Haven Register; The DartmouthFederal Appellate Court Decisions* Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
 And she says that “Andelman possesses in-depth expertise in industries including: insurance, financial services, health care, accounting, law, among others,” which is not only absolutely correct, but also fairly widely known in some circles. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Ciro EEOC Investigations Requires That Employers Notify Insurance CarrierAmerican Center v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
 Mandelman Inc. was a corporation I used to do some publishing and consulting under, although I haven’t done such work in quite some time… maybe 8-10 years. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
About $33 million in cash will be paid by the executives and the California company's insurer to KLA, according to lawyers briefed on the settlement, who requested anonymity because details of the deal haven't been made public. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am by Peter Mahler
Last month, in Flor v Greenberg Farrow Architectural Inc., a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down an opinion with important lessons for business owners and practitioners in states that have adopted the Revised Uniform LLC Act, such as New Jersey, as well as in states that haven’t, such as New York. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am by rainey Reitman
  Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:51 am by Beck, et al.
And worse, the insurance companies that pay for most med-mal defense don’t often want to pay for a lot of legal research of the sort necessary to get their counsel up to speed on this sort of peculiar theory. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:34 am by Eric Turkewitz
Scott Greenfield (one of my co-defendants) instantly dubbed the suit Rakofsky v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
These groups are supervised by conservative gatekeepers, the insurance companies that monitor for fair use. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 9:17 am
What's worse is that I haven't even heard from that freakin' attorney from the insurance company. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
The idea came about because insurance companies discovered that some doctors who actually meant it were apologizing to patients and when they did the patients were less likely to sue the doctors for malpractice. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
(v) A written acknowledgement that the applicant (and any co-applicant) has/have read and understood the disclosure, and understand that the disclosure is a required part of the mortgage application. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
 In 2011, not unexpectedly, the EECS was focused on publicly traded companies in the financial institution sector and how those companies portrayed their exposure to sovereign debt. [read post]