Search for: "J. P. v. S. S. and C. S." Results 221 - 240 of 3,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
— Regulations made pursuant to s. 114(2) of the Immigration Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Parisien c. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 11:59 pm by JR Chaves
Daría todo lo que sé, por la mitad de los que ignoro VÁZQUEZ MATILLA, Javier. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am by Emma Kent
As a reminder… ‘Obvious & gross’ In the case of Wachtel v Wachtel [1973], the issue of conduct was considered by the family court and further summarised by Lady Hale in Miller [2006] as follows:“[…] once the assets are seen as a pool, and the couple as equal partners, then it is only equitable to take their conduct into account if one has been very much more to blame than the other: in the famous words of Ormrod J in Wachtel v Wachtel… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Michigan J. of Law Reform 175 (2013) (with Clayton Cramer and Joseph Olson). [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Suivant les conclusions de l’arrêt R. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:13 am
Esperamos que esta nueva publicación resulte de interés para el público en general, y de modo especial para aquellos que se interesan en los temas del derecho. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
PÉNAL (DROIT) — juridiction pénale — Cour supérieure — règle du stare decisis — réexamen d’un précédent de la Cour suprême du Canada (R. c. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:49 am by Eugene Volokh
In today's Wade v Univ. of Michigan, the Michigan Supreme Court sent a challenge to the University of Michigan's gun ban back to the Court of Appeals, for consideration in light of N.Y. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses Miller and Tucker's claim that the American Founders were unfamiliar with dramatic technological changes in firearms — a claim that is refuted by Dupuy's data. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
A museum or gallery’s physical ownership of a work does not equate to ownership of the copyrights, as the two confer different privileges.[21] “Ownership of the work itself allow[s] you to display the art, whilst copyright ownership allows an artist to retain all rights to print, copy and distribute its work, even if the original is sold. [read post]