Search for: "J. v. K" Results 221 - 240 of 2,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2022, 7:22 am by Matthias Weller
The Commission Implementing Regulation No 1329/2014 (point 9 of Annex IV to Form V) does not have a bearing on this decision as it can only implement but not modify the Regulation (para. 73). [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 8:24 am by Josh Blackman
S. 618, 661 (2007) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting). [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm by Josh Blackman
(iii) certification of completion of the training required in subdivision nineteen of this section; (iv) a list of former and current social media accounts of the applicant from the past three years to confirm the information regarding the applicants character and conduct as required in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph; and (v) such other information required by the licensing officer that is reasonably necessary and related to the review of the licensing application. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But the Supreme Court wrote, in an opinion by Justice William J. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:50 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Having financed the rise of Maximilian I, Jakob Fugger made considerable contributions to secure the election of the Spanish king Charles I to become Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 6:19 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Climate Change Discourse in the United NationsTyler Jost, Kaine Meshkin, & Robert Schub, The Character and Origins of Military Attitudes on the Use of ForcePedro Seabra & Rafael Mesquita, Beyond Roll-Call Voting: Sponsorship Dynamics at the UN General AssemblyClara Egger & Doris Schopper, Organizations Involved in Humanitarian Action: Introducing a New Dataset Douglas M Gibler & Steven V Miller, An Appraisal of Project Mars and the Divided Armies ArgumentBryce W Reeder,… [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]