Search for: "JONES v. BLACK" Results 221 - 240 of 576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 3:55 pm by Sme
Catholic Health Initiatives (10th Cir., December 19, 2017) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Catholic Health: ERISA's church-plan exemption does not fall foul of the Establishment Clause)Discrimination/Retaliation*Jones v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:37 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
BACKGROUND The appellant is a practising barrister and is black. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 31 October until Wednesday 1 November, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
  In 1991, a jury in Jones County, Georgia, sentenced Keith Tharpe, a Black man, to death for the murder of his sister-in-law. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
  Citing religious beliefs, Bob Jones University argued that it had a right to refuse to admit interracial couples or students who supported interracial marriage. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
  Citing religious beliefs, Bob Jones University argued that it had a right to refuse to admit interracial couples or students who supported interracial marriage. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
., the ball actually landed on Black 15 next to Red 34, or even on Black 22 on the other side -- which means that at a minimum only one bettor out of three could collect), the so-called "plurality" consensus fails, and there remain only the separate reasonings to get to that result, which do not unite or agree in any way.This is the problem with the opinions as rendered by the South Carolina Supreme Court in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case, and it is the key… [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
., the ball actually landed on Black 15 next to Red 34, or even on Black 22 on the other side -- which means that at a minimum only one bettor out of three could collect), the so-called "plurality" consensus fails, and there remain only the separate reasonings to get to that result, which do not unite or agree in any way.This is the problem with the opinions as rendered by the South Carolina Supreme Court in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case, and it is the key… [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm by Jamie Baker
Herzig, A Diachronic Approach to Bob Jones: Religious Tax Exemptions After Obergefell, 92 IND. [read post]