Search for: "Jackson v. People of State of California" Results 221 - 240 of 378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
People of the State of New York, No. 06-0341 A state-party's failure to fulfill its obligation to inform a detained alien of the prospect of consular notification and access, pursuant to Article 36 of the Vienna Convention, cannot form the basis for the individual to bring an action for damages under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), 42 U.S.C. section 1983, or directly under the Vienna Convention. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
On 25 and 26 July 2018, the Court of Appeal (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Quinn did affirm the district court’s decision to disregard primary election procedures embodied in state law, but only in order to comply with the legislature’s prescribed date for the replacement election in the Illinois Election Code; thus, one way to read the case is as saying that if something in state law had to give (both under state law and as required by the Seventeenth Amendment), it should be the primary system, not the legislatively selected… [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am by Ross Schulman
It’s a situation that echoes EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7747, Jackson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
Justice Thomas stresses (as Judge Ho did in his separate Fifth Circuit opinion) that: This case is not about whether States can disarm people who threaten others. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Consider only the fact that in the 2016 election, the 39 million people of California—roughly two million more than live in the twenty-one smallest state, plus the District of Columbia, combined, received only 55 electoral votes, while the 21 states plus D.C. got a total of 95. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am by jonathanturley
” Most recently, the dean and chancellor of University of California Hastings College of the Law David Faigman questioned the legitimacy of the Court after the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” It says that “only five states [Texas, Florida, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Alabama] executed people this year, and only seven states [Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Louisiana, North Carolina, and Texas] sentenced people to death. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Aston described the claimant as a “feminist cretin” and said that she “set fire to people’s money”. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
The inmate appeal process is controlled by the very people who violatepolicy and abuse prisoners. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am by Marie Louise
(Copyright Litigation Blog) Columbia law expert on telecom, copyright to FTC (IP Watch) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California confirms no fair use exception to digital lock provisions under the DMCA: USA v Matthew Crippen (IP Osgoode) District Court E D Texas: Another Texas judge scrutinises mass copyright litigation: Steve Hardeman LLC v. [read post]