Search for: "Jackson v. Russell"
Results 221 - 240
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
Justice Harvey noted the following: 49] The purpose of non-pecuniary damage awards is "to compensate the plaintiff for pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and loss of amenities": Jackson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Grubb v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
Levine," featuring Scott Angstreich (of Kellogg Huber), who worked on the briefs for Levine, and Russell Jackson again. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
Did Levine effectively overrule Geier v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
As you know, we've had a few words to say about the Supreme Court's decision last week in Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:37 am
More: Russell Jackson (via Beck & Herrmann), Carter @ ShopFloor, Daniel Fisher @ Forbes, Ted Frank @ Overlawyered,... [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 9:19 am
" Jackson on Consumer Class Actions & Mass Torts.Written by Russell Jackson of Skadden, this weblog strives to spark a "continuing conversation about consumer class actions and mass torts. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:25 pm
In awarding the Plaintiff $19,000 for his non-pecuniary loss as a result of soft tissue injuries Madam Justice Russell summarized the law of non-pecuniary damages as follows: [32] The purpose of non-pecuniary damage awards is to compensate the plaintiff for "pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and loss… [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
Doug Powell's BarfBlog Defense Invokes Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:34 pm
Russell Jackson reports on the case here, and we'll defer to his description. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:09 am
(Lord knows, we can use all the help we can get.)So we welcome aboard our new visitors who came through this link from Russell Jackson's Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts blog.We're also delighted to be spared the effort of writing up Williams v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm
Russell Wimbley Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 09a0030p.06 USA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm
Russell Wimbley Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 09a0030p.06 USA v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 6:07 am
In doing so Madam Justice Russell summarized the law of non-pecuniary damages ar paragraphs 104-105 of the judgment as follows: Non-pecuniary damages [104] The purpose of non-pecuniary damage awards is to compensate the plaintiff for "pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and loss of amenities": Jackson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:06 pm
Russell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Branch Western District of Kentucky at Louisville 08a0288p.06 2008/08/12 Russell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
ELLIOTT, AND KANE RUSSELL, COLEMAN & LOGAN, P.C.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-05-01013-CV, 241 SW3d 689, 12-13-07)08-0084 MCALLEN HOSPITALS, L.P., ET AL. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:14 am
Jackson);Said that a plaintiff alleging sexual harassment claims under the Minnesota Human Rights Act based on sexual harassment by a supervisor is not required to prove that the employer knew or should have known about the harassment and failed to take timely and appropriate action (Freiler v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:58 am
The Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic today filed this Brief in Opposition in the case of Green v. [read post]
