Search for: "Jefferson et al" Results 221 - 240 of 272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2011, 1:52 pm by Steve Bainbridge
” Matthew Barbabella et al., Insider Trading in Congress: The Need for Regulation, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1318682. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Don Cruse
” How to restart a Texas state case after it is remanded from federal court Maria Del Carmen Gulbot Serros de Gonzalez et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
In 1816, Thomas Jefferson called on Americans to “crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of their country. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Part of the problem is getting systematic data on petitioning in American history (see Blackhawk et al 2020 for an important start). [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by David Kopel
" Letter from George Washington to John Hancock, President of the Continental Congress (Sept. 2, 1776), in 5 Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789, at 733 (Worthington Chauncey Ford et al. eds., 1904-37). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Spece Jr. et al., (Implicit) Consent to Intimacy, 50 IND. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
And that's exactly what happened with Ashcroft, Comey, Goldsmith, et al., when the President was prepared to adopt Addington's views rather than theirs, and to break the law contrary to their judgment. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm by Donna Coker
Academics Speak Out About VAWA ReauthorizationVAWA Is Not Enough:    Academics Speak Out About VAWA Caroline Bettinger-Lopez, Donna Coker, Julie Goldscheid, Leigh Goodmark, Valli Kalei Kanuha, James Ptacek, Deborah Weissman  The VAWA reauthorization bill would extend funding for important services; provide additional protections for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; and would ensure that tribal courts have jurisdiction over domestic… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Jack Goldsmith
A host of interest groups—the ACLU, CPJ, et al—would storm onto the scene, firing off press releases about the downfall of the American republic. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am by Bridget Crawford
Statement by Caroline Bettinger-Lopez, Donna Coker, Julie Goldscheid, Leigh Goodmark, Valli Kalei Kanuha, James Ptacek, Deborah Weissman  The VAWA reauthorization bill would extend funding for important services; provide additional protections for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; and would ensure that tribal courts have jurisdiction over domestic violence that occurs on tribal land. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to… [read post]