Search for: "Jefferson v Long"
Results 221 - 240
of 732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2017, 3:07 am
President Thomas Jefferson, Marshall’s long-time foe, nominated Johnson to the bench in 1804. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:16 pm
Kunz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
This position was long believed to have been discredited by the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
Notably, the Fourth Circuit also found that the owner’s actual knowledge of the basis for the lien was irrelevant. [12] Jefferson Door Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:36 am
Ct. 2480 (2015)Thomas Jefferson University v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
The volume explores the potential for changing a system that many contend is long overdue. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
The case is Railroad Commission of Texas and Pioneer Exploration, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:03 pm
" So said Congress, so says the law, and so said the Supreme Court in Diamond v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
With the Supreme Court taking an off ramp in Murthy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
For eleven stellar seasons, the CBS hit "The Jeffersons" told the hilarious story of George and Weezie, who had moved on up the socio-economic ladder to "a deluxe apartment in the sky. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:08 am
In Abrams v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:40 pm
Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Estate of Myron Tucker v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 12:11 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
” – the court has provided guidance on the relevance of this issue to the question of “outstanding benefit” in the long running dispute of Shanks v Unilever PLC and others [2017] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Young, U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:44 am
In Graham v. [read post]
