Search for: "Jeffrey Fisher" Results 221 - 240 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2016, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
” At Vox, Victoria Massie looks at Fisher v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
”) and followup (problems with state’s legal theory), Jeffrey Singer/Cato, and Jacob Sullum, Reason (sweeping definition of public nuisance) and followup (other problems). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am by Jeff Welty
Supreme Court frequent flyer Jeffrey Fisher of Stanford Law will be representing Heien. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 4:20 am
For 25 years, the men shared bank accounts, apartments and eventually a home in Fishers. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 11:44 am
"They already have to be on any list of potential Supreme Court nominations for the administration," said Jeffrey Fisher, a Stanford law professor who argues before the high court. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:37 am by Marissa Miller
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Stanford law professor Jeffrey Fisher discusses the upcoming oral argument in Williams v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm by Mark Walsh
There is an air of anticipation as spectators gather in the courtroom for the first day of the new term. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
   This simple thesis comes across in essays by professors Daniel Farber (clerk OT76), Rory Little (part-time clerk OT84), Gregory Magarian (clerk OT94), Jeffrey Fisher (clerk OT98), Deborah Pearlstein (clerk OT00), and Pamela Karlan (election law scholar). [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:35 am by SHG
Of that 22, exactly one of them (Professor Jeffrey Fisher of Stanford Law) can be described as a criminal defense specialist. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Nathan
  Fisher also said that Hamdi v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:43 am by Rory Little
Longtime Supreme Court advocate Jeffrey Fisher, arguing for criminal defendants Victor Stitts and Jason Sims, ended the second hour by seeking to turn this point to his advantage, suggesting that the court should rule for his clients so that, if Congress is dissatisfied, it will act rather than leave the court to “own this jurisprudence [for] a lot longer. [read post]
Pamela Karlan, Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law and co-host of Stanford Legal, interviewed her clinic co-directors Professor Jeffrey Fisher, who has argued numerous cases before the high court, and Professor Easha Anand, who joined the SLS faculty last year and has argued three Supreme Court cases since then. [read post]