Search for: "Jennings v. Jennings"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2019, 5:37 am
Circuit in the Qassim v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:08 am
Jennings v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:50 am
Jennings, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:29 am
The recent grant of certiorari in Martinez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 3:10 pm
The discussion focused on the 11th Circuit’s recent decision in Myhra v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:15 am
In Jennings v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:02 am
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be… [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:24 am
On February 22, 2012, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Jennings v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:14 pm
Draft papers should be submitted by 15 September 2016. 1 Larry May, After Wars End (CUP, 2012)2 See Carsten Stahn, Jennifer Easterday and Jens Iverson, Just Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations (OUP, 2014)3 Carsten Stahn, Jens Iverson, and Jennifer Easterday, Environmental Protection and Transitions from Conflict to Peace: Clarifying Norms, Principles and Practices (OUP, forthcoming).4 Special Issue Jus Post Bellum and Foreign Investment, Journal of World Investment &… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be… [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 4:32 pm
The first case was GoRhinoGo, LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Jennings v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:38 am
"Appellate specialist Jens Koepke writes about the recent Cal Supreme Court opinion in Jameson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:46 am
Pre-Arbitration Requirements After BG Group v Argentina Anna Joubin-Bret, Spotlight on Third-Party Funding in Investor-State Arbitration Jonathan Ketcheson, The Law 42 Arbitrations: Ecuador’s Efforts to Capture ‘Extraordinary Profits’ of Oil Companies [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 1:48 pm
(People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Jennings v. [read post]
