Search for: "John Doe Defendants A, B, C, D, and E" Results 221 - 240 of 348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Ken
John Doe Resists: Ingenuity 13 LLC begins to issue subpoenas seeking to reveal the identity of John Doe. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Johns–Manville Corp., 539 A.2d 871 (1988), where the defendants were asbestos manufacturers headquartered in Pennsylvania and the plaintiff was a New Jersey resident injured, mostly, in New Jersey (but also a little in Pennsylvania). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  So, too, in 1989 the Court appointed John Roberts, currently the Chief Justice, as amicus to defend the judgment below in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm by assoulineberlowe
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, National Association, EMC   Mortgage Services, LLC and John Does 1-10. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/CASTLETON-BK-SD-IN-LORCH-9-30-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Absent exigent circumstances, stay imposed per Ch 15 is coterminous w/stay in corresponding foreign proceeding. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/DAEWOO-BK-SD-NY-LIFLAND-10-5-11.pdf … B-IA dismisses §548(a)(1)(B) cplt under Twiqbal based on failure to adequate plead insolvency, even if FRCP 9 inapplic.… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:22 am by John L. Welch
Google, Inc.., 676 F.3d 144, 153-54 (4th Circuit 2012)Looking to the six non-exhaustive factors of Section 43(c)(1)(B)(1), the court found insufficient similarity between the marks, no evidence that Defendant intended to associate with the SWATCH mark, and no actual association between the marks. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:40 pm by Paul E. Freehling
The plaintiff changed the theory of the case each time the defendant successfully rebutted a prior theory; e. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
When lawyer Dirk Lasater asked if we'd be interested in publishing these excerpts from his article “Closing Pandora’s Box: Speculative Invoicing and Opportunism in File Sharing”, we jumped at the chance. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:31 am by Susan Brenner
Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990) (`[C]apacity to claim the protection of the 4th Amendmen [read post]