Search for: "Jonathan Sharp"
Results 221 - 240
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2012, 5:54 am
Not So Easy - bit.ly/z5GZUe (Tam Harbert) Hacker Points to Weakness in LexisNexis Concordance - bit.ly/zjdXby (Evan Koblentz) Landmark E-Discovery Decision Recognizes the Appropriateness of Predictive Coding Review - bit.ly/yiwBVk (Squire Sanders) Electronic Medical Records: Legal Risks of Going Paperless - bit.ly/yLrr5x (Alicia Gallegos) Employment Discrimination Protocols for Discovery: They’re Coming - bit.ly/ycL6GF (Daniel Schwartz) Ethics… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
National Park Service Director Jonathan Jarvis had defended the protester’s First Amendment rights in the park to a hostile Congressman Darrel Issa (R), of California, during congressional hearings. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:00 am
Robert Taylor, Jonathan Barr and James Harden were exonerated by the same evidence in November and Robert Veal was exonerated the following month. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
Much to be dealt with… Also significant, Jonathan Djanogly appears to have waved the white flag on the economic justification of the LASPO Bill. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
I assume that Jonathan Small, James Stark and Daniel Robinson (counsel for the sellers) are sharpening their keyboards for the SC application – the report I’ve seen doesn’t say whether the CA gave permission to appeal, but I’d assume that it should follow given the importance of the matter both in law and quantitatively (given that FSA regulation of this area was a latecomer).In essence, the underlying question is whether the House of Lords was correct in Abbey… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
It was a busy media law week at the Royal Courts of Justice, with the seventh week of the Leveson Inquiry and the settlement of 37 phone hacking cases against News International. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:50 am
" (Jonathan Turley, Robot Love?) [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
"The statement is a sharp departure from previous discussion of mounting a ballot campaign for a $4 billion to $5 billion bond measure on behalf of CIRM. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 10:01 am
Professor Macey ends with a sharp, and I think wholly appropriate, note: Assaults on the private-equity industry really are attacks on economic freedom, because the private-equity process is nothing more and nothing less than free-market capitalism at work. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:00 pm
Robert Taylor, Jonathan Barr and James Harden were exonerated by the same evidence in November and Robert Veal was exonerated the following month. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:19 am
Jonathan Adler I was terribly saddened to learn that Professor Larry Ribstein suffered a stroke and died yesterday. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:02 pm
Andrew Sharpe (@TMT_lawyer) – “Caffeine-fuelled telecoms partner in law firm Charles Russell LLP”. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:51 am
” National Post – Jonathan Kay: “Hitchens had no base — which is to say, no regular mob of readers who could be depended on to applaud his columns — because he had no dogma. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
Veal and four other teenagers-Jonathan Barr, Robert Taylor, James Harden and Shainne Sharp-were wrongfully convicted of the 1991 rape and murder of 14-year-old Cateresa Matthews of southwest suburban Chicago. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 4:48 am
Jonathan Heawood (@jheawood) – English PEN director. 37. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:17 am
Trevor Sharp, United States Magistrate Judge. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:17 am
Trevor Sharp, United States Magistrate Judge. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:00 am
The three who have recently been exonerated-Robert Taylor, Jonathan Barr and James Harden-attended the hearing in a show of support. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
The Daily Mail’s counsel, Jonathan Caplan, argued that the paper’s data requests outlined in the ‘What Price Privacy Now‘ report (2006) were legal. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
The history of how this came to be is vexed, and we need not review the involved story of the roles variously played by Professor Glueck, Colonel Chanler, Colonel Bernays, President Roosevelt, Secretary Stimson, Justice Jackson, and Baron Shawcross that led to framing the trial around the crime of aggressive war.[11] As Jonathan Bush has demonstrated, the decision made for sharp disagreements not only among the Allied powers – the French in particular never accepted this… [read post]
