Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders" Results 221 - 240 of 738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2012, 12:33 pm by Luke Rioux
The officer exercised unfettered discretion and seized the defendant, without further justification, to see if he had a committed a crime. [read post]
23 Jul 2006, 7:56 pm by The Owens Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Extrinsic evidence of sexual assaults to show propensity is allowed, even those assaults for which the defendant has not been charged.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
The plaintiff prepared a written agreement and stated it contained these provisions, which defendants signed without reading it. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:23 am by Charlotte Law Library
The question presented in the Jones case was: did the law enforcement officers violate the Fourth Amendment by not getting a warrant before installing a GPS device on the defendant’s car? [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm by David Ettinger
:  Is a campus security officer employed by a public school district a “public officer” for purposes of a charge of willfully resisting, delaying, or obstructing a “public officer” in violation of Penal Code section 148? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am by Rory Little
Jones, 2012) is a “search;” and that employing a “thermal heat imager” from a police car on a public road (Kyllo v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  In contrast, Master McCloud in Paxton Jones v Chichester Harbour Conservancy [2017] EWHC 2270 found that the deeming provisions operate as a means of calculating other deadlines, such as the acknowledgement of service and defence. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Jones–Kelley, 675 F.3d 580, 583 (6th Circuit 2012). [read post]