Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders" Results 221 - 240 of 738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Florida issues; and (2) whether the Eighth and 14th Amendments require the petitioner and other similarly situated defendants to receive Hurst relief based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Caldwell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8995, involves the truly obscure question of whether a period of supervised release for one offense is tolled during a period of pretrial confinement (that, upon conviction, would be credited to a defendant’s term of imprisonment for another offense). [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The Judicial Office was led to issue a clarificatory press statement on 25 October 2018. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Fairfax media intends to defend the claim, the Sydney Morning Herald Reports. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Halleck, 17-1702, which asks whether the private operator of a public access TV channel is a “state actor” for constitutional purposes. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am by Nathaniel Sobel
Jones (holding that installation of a GPS device on a target's vehicle constituted a search), and Riley v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
City of Miami Fire Fighters and Police Officers’ Retirement Trust, 17-1056 Issue: Whether, or in what circumstances, a defendant must admit that non-forward-looking statements are false or misleading, in order to be protected by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act safe-harbor provision for forward-looking statements. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
American Humanist Association, 18-18); A case presenting the question of when a private operator of a public-access TV channel can be deemed a state actor and thus be subject to First Amendment scrutiny (Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:55 am by SHG
But the lawyer from the state Office of the Defender General decided to go it on her own. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am by CECILY WHITE
The officers were not parties to the civil claim and had declined to give evidence at the trial due to fears for their own safety following the release of their identities into the public domain by the Independent Police Complaints Commission, now the Independent Office for Police Conduct. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Kevin Russell
Kavanaugh acknowledges that “[i]ndependent agencies are constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor v. the United States” before adding that “what is constitutional is not always wise. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am by Edward Foley
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (Art Lien) We can see this philosophy at work in Kennedy’s 2013 concurrence in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The Court has applied the doctrine to bank records, in United States v. [read post]