Search for: "Jones v. Smith" Results 221 - 240 of 944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2012, 11:30 am by Bridget Crawford
In attempting to distinguish Smith, the Supreme Court not only created an incoherent free exercise jurisprudence but also ignored Jones v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:23 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
  A quick read suggests three critical analytic steps (which I confess to finding rather unpersuasive): Judge Leon dismisses Smith v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:53 pm
Ilazi, 730 F.2d 1120, 1126-27 (8th Cir. 1984); Smith, 389 F.3d at 951; Lugo, 170 F.3d at 1003; United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 1574 (21 December 2011) Padden v Bevan Ashford Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 1616 (21 December 2011) Kinnear v Whittaker [2011] EWCA Civ 1609 (21 December 2011) Q (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1610 (21 December 2011) Delaney v Pickett & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 (21 December 2011) Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd (t/a Galliford Try Rail) [2011] EWCA… [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Smith, Third Circuit: As part of Appellant Smith's sentence for bank fraud and aggravated identity theft, he was ordered to pay restitution of $68,452. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s other grants included: Chiaverini v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
  (A decision like unto last week's ruling by the Utah Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
Judges Jones, Smith, and Elrod round out the pack. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
By contrast, Judge Smith in dissent, while not using that analogy exactly, gets the point across:"The right of confrontation includes -- indeed, is, at its core -- the right to meet one's accuser face to face (Coy v Iowa, 487 US 1012, 1016 [1988]). [read post]