Search for: "KEY v. LONDON"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2020, 6:42 am
Thomas Schultz (King's College London - Law) & Federico Ortino (King's College London - Law) have published The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration (Oxford Univ. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
The Panopticon Blog had a post “Key points from the Bridges facial recognition appeal”. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am
As for the legal standard for tying, Epic refers to the Ninth Circuit's 2008 Cascade Health Sols. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 10:46 am
Tiemo, R (on the application of) v Lambeth London Borough Council (2020) EWHC 1193 (Admin) A interim judicial review decision from May, but judgment just out. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:09 pm
Wade, the defeat of the Bork nomination, Bush v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
I therefore thought it would be useful to publish a list of the statutes that I could find and a summary of some of the key court decisions interpreting those statutes. [1]. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
The Covington team representing BSA in these cases is led by partner Lisa Peets and includes Brussels and London lawyers Kristof Van Quathem, Bart Van Vooren, and Sam Jungyun Choi. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:06 am
The issues at the centre of these important referrals - on which see at greater length here and here - revolve around the key issue of whether platforms which make available user-uploaded content perform an act of communication to the public under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.Other issues include:The availability of the hosting safe harbour in Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive to platforms which communicate to the publicInjunctions under Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc… [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am
The key authority on vicarious liability is Catholic Child Welfare Society v Various Claimants [2012] UKSC 56 (often referred to as Christian Brothers), in which the Supreme Court confirmed that in the absence of an employment contract the test for vicarious liability had two stages. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 12:22 pm
Eleonora highlighted and discussed key recent cases including Wycon v KIKO, Ilse Jacobsen v Morso Sko Import and finally, Brompton Bicycle. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm
Law.com had a piece “The 4 Keys to Mastering Data Privacy”. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Alito started and ended his inquiry with 1789 as the key benchmark for the Suspension Clause inquiry. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
The key commonality the court found was that “all these cases are about release from restraint. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:13 pm
In 2017, The Federal Security Services contacted Telegram’s London office and requested the company to provide it with decryption keys to access messages sent from six Telegram accounts. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
After it was discovered that the death rate from obesity is 80 times higher than from foodborne illnesses per year (400,000 v. 5,000 respectively), it became clear that ultra-processed foods and foods, rich in sugar and saturated fats threaten our lives even more than foodborne parasites, disease-caused bacteria, toxins, unapproved additives or allergens, traditionally associated with food safety, and that FDA’s policy in that area should include initiatives addressing the quality of… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
In hearing the question of leave together with the appeal, then granting leave, the two key issues for determination by the Court of Appeal were: Whether a claim for unliquidated damages could fall within the scope of the arbitration clause which required claims to be concerning monetary amounts ‘under this agreement’ (the construction issue); and Whether Hannigan had waived his entitlement to arbitrate by bringing the proceedings in 2017 (the waiver issue). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Mitchell, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Islington (2020) EWHC 1478 (Admin) Where a local authority has an initial s.188 Housing Act 1996 duty to provide interim accommodation, but then makes a s.184 decision that the applicant is not in priority need, is that sufficient to bring the s.188 duty to an end? [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
Walt Disney Company | The Chalk Pencil infringement claims have been erased: Lanard Toys v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
GuestKat Thomas Key shared his analysis of the decision in Daniels v. [read post]
