Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 221 - 240
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm
In the blogosphere, Kent Scheidegger and Bill Otis had several posts critical of the decision at Crime and Consequences, while the PolitiCal blog of the Los Angeles Times reports on reactions by various state officials in California – as well as the possibility that the ruling will “bolster efforts by Gov. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 8:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which supports the death penalty, disagrees that the decline will last. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 9:53 pm
Intriguingly, it appears that death penalty supporter Kent Scheidegger has now begrudgingly accepted the de facto moratorium label. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
Here, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences discusses Fry v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:33 pm
Kent Scheidegger is with the No on 62 campaign. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:13 am
While death penalty opponents are claiming that the drug is untested and might cause pain, CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger noted "If death penalty opponents were really concerned about inmates' pain, they would help reopen the supply. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
Astrid Galvan and Jim Salter report for the Associated Press (via ABC News), while Kent Scheidegger discusses the case at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:51 am
On Sunday, The New York Times had commentary from two lawyers who filed amicus briefs in the Graham and Sullivan cases:Â Marc Mauer, executive director of The Sentencing Project and Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 6:41 pm
Kent Scheidegger's take is on the argument is here. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has the first part of his overview of the just-ended Term’s criminal cases. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger also discusses the process by which the Court modifies its opinions more generally, and he urges the Court to follow the lead of the California Supreme Court, which issues “modification orders. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences reports here on the Court's decision to grant certiorari in Watson v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Here, at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Supreme Court's dismissal of Roper v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:04 pm
Other coverage of, and commentary on, the grant in Hall comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences – who suggests that the case may entice the Court to “micromanage” the states’ procedures for determining retardation — and Andrew Cohen of The Atlantic, who predicts that the Court’s decision in the case will hinge on Justice Kennedy. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:18 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports on a petition for certiorari challenging Arizona’s switch from thiopental to pentobarbital for lethal injections; the Associated Press (via the Arizona Star) provides more background on the case. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Thanks to Kent Scheidegger (Crime and Consequences) for the pointer. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:53 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the Supreme Court last week allowed the execution of Alabama inmate Torey McNabb to go forward. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:17 pm
Additional early commentary comes from Ross Barkan for The Guardian, Jonathan Adler for The Volokh Conspiracy at The Washington Post, Rick Hasen for his Election Law Blog, Ilya Shapiro and Roger Pilon for Cato at Liberty, Ramesh Ponnuru for National Review, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern for Slate, Kent Scheidegger for his Crime and Consequences blog, Ian Millhiser with two posts for Think Progress, Andrew Prokop for Vox, Charles Pierce for Esquire, Ivan Eland for The… [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the case of Stephen Michael West, whose request for a stay of execution and cert petition challenging Tennessee’s lethal-injection protocol were denied without comment last week. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports on an opinion by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court holding that the Confrontation Clause rule established by the Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
