Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 221 - 240
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger said that the bill will go nowhere, citing polls indicating that most Americans do not want to abolish capital punishment. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:01 am
Other coverage of the year-end report comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal and Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:51 am
On Sunday, The New York Times had commentary from two lawyers who filed amicus briefs in the Graham and Sullivan cases:Â Marc Mauer, executive director of The Sentencing Project and Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:59 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes comments by Attorney General Eric Holder about Glossip v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 1:40 pm
Despite the many coming hurdles, "The decision was a home run," says Kent Scheidegger in this article. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger dubs November 5 “federalism day” at the Court and discusses the role of the states in that day’s cases: Bond v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:18 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports on a petition for certiorari challenging Arizona’s switch from thiopental to pentobarbital for lethal injections; the Associated Press (via the Arizona Star) provides more background on the case. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:35 am
Participating in the program were Harvard Law Professor Carol Steiker and CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Thanks to Kent Scheidegger (Crime and Consequences) for the pointer. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Here, at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Supreme Court's dismissal of Roper v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:19 am
In this weekend’s coverage of the Court: Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences previews Davis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences reports here on the Court's decision to grant certiorari in Watson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:32 pm
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has these comments on the end of the Term and reversal rates for federal circuits. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 9:53 pm
Intriguingly, it appears that death penalty supporter Kent Scheidegger has now begrudgingly accepted the de facto moratorium label. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:52 am
Seeks Supreme Court Review of Marathon Bomber Case (Kent Scheidegger, Crime & Consequences) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:42 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses “dangerously sloppy language” in the Court’s opinion in Hurst v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:33 pm
Kent Scheidegger is with the No on 62 campaign. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
Kent Scheidegger has some interesting discussion of the issues over at the Crime and Consequences blog.The post When Prosecutors "Take a Dive" — The Purported "Error" in the Glossip Case appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm
In the blogosphere, Kent Scheidegger and Bill Otis had several posts critical of the decision at Crime and Consequences, while the PolitiCal blog of the Los Angeles Times reports on reactions by various state officials in California – as well as the possibility that the ruling will “bolster efforts by Gov. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:28 am
And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to concerns, expressed by Justice Kagan during her appearance at the university, about cameras in the Supreme Court with a counterproposal: “Have the arguments recorded by a single camera under the court. [read post]
