Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 221 - 240
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2016, 3:33 pm
Kent Scheidegger is with the No on 62 campaign. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has the first part of his overview of the just-ended Term’s criminal cases. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 1:31 am
"
"Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, which supports the death penalty, disagrees that the decline will last. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences reports here on the Court's decision to grant certiorari in Watson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
Here, Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences discusses Fry v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:18 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports on a petition for certiorari challenging Arizona’s switch from thiopental to pentobarbital for lethal injections; the Associated Press (via the Arizona Star) provides more background on the case. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
In sharp contrast, Kent Scheidegger, in this long post at Crime and Consequences, ends his post with this radically different assessment: This looks pretty good for the state. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:32 pm
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has these comments on the end of the Term and reversal rates for federal circuits. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger said that the bill will go nowhere, citing polls indicating that most Americans do not want to abolish capital punishment. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:45 am
Kent Scheidegger weighs in here at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences has this post on the medicinal marijuana Raich case, which was redecided by the Ninth Circuit today almost two years after being remanded by the Court. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm
In the blogosphere, Kent Scheidegger and Bill Otis had several posts critical of the decision at Crime and Consequences, while the PolitiCal blog of the Los Angeles Times reports on reactions by various state officials in California – as well as the possibility that the ruling will “bolster efforts by Gov. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:30 am
Here’s a round-up of other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court’s liberals face a new era of conservative dominance (Joan Biskupic, CNN) SCOTUS Needs to Decide Law, Not Just Fix Errors (Alan Morrison, Bloomberg Law) The Supreme Court Is Colliding With a Less-Religious America (Ronald Brownstein, The Atlantic) Supreme Court to Determine Fate of Religious Schools (Kelly Shackelford, Newsweek) The Danger of Introducing New Factual Claims at the… [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:04 pm
Other coverage of, and commentary on, the grant in Hall comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today, Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences – who suggests that the case may entice the Court to “micromanage” the states’ procedures for determining retardation — and Andrew Cohen of The Atlantic, who predicts that the Court’s decision in the case will hinge on Justice Kennedy. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:59 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes comments by Attorney General Eric Holder about Glossip v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:13 am
While death penalty opponents are claiming that the drug is untested and might cause pain, CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger noted "If death penalty opponents were really concerned about inmates' pain, they would help reopen the supply. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger also discusses the process by which the Court modifies its opinions more generally, and he urges the Court to follow the lead of the California Supreme Court, which issues “modification orders. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:17 pm
Additional early commentary comes from Ross Barkan for The Guardian, Jonathan Adler for The Volokh Conspiracy at The Washington Post, Rick Hasen for his Election Law Blog, Ilya Shapiro and Roger Pilon for Cato at Liberty, Ramesh Ponnuru for National Review, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern for Slate, Kent Scheidegger for his Crime and Consequences blog, Ian Millhiser with two posts for Think Progress, Andrew Prokop for Vox, Charles Pierce for Esquire, Ivan Eland for The… [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 1:45 pm
Russell dismissing a convicted murderer's appeal because he missed the filing deadline even though a district court judge mistakenly noted a later deadline; Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences weighs in here. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:01 am
Other coverage of the year-end report comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal and Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences. [read post]
