Search for: "Kind v. Clark" Results 221 - 240 of 489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
  Some conclusions of fact are, however, not conclusions of primary fact of the kind to which I have just referred. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm by WSLL
Mother does not, however, identify any in-kind benefits received by Father. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Steven Boutwell
” Volunteers are not considered employees, though applicants should be mindful that individuals receiving in-kind compensation for work performed are not considered volunteers but, rather, employees for purposes of size. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
Scalia and Thomas have a clear and large-scale vision for constitutional law, in which (for example) affirmative action is abolished, Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 12:13 pm by David Walk
We first looked for recent scholarship on Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm by Susan Brenner
A police car is not the kind of public place, like a phone booth (e.g., Katz v. [read post]