Search for: "King v. Edwards" Results 221 - 240 of 416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am by Amy Howe
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Joey Meyer looks at the impact of recent comments by Jonathan Gruber, one of the architects of the Affordable Care Act, on King v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
Still other coverage and commentary focus on King v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:15 am by Isobel Williams
“Two Members of Parliament, Walter Elliot and Robert Boothby, who were watching from the pavement, heard the King [Edward VIII] mutter, ‘Christ! [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of and commentary on the Court continue to focus on King v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
Last week’s cert. grant in King v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” From 1911 to 1936, under George V, it read, “Dei Gra Rex Et Ind Imp,” which stands for, Dei Gratia Rex et India Imperator, which means, “By the Grace of God, King and Emperor of India. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The controversy has already reached the Justices in the case of King v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
It’s also a point that Judge Edwards made in his opinion respecting the denial of en banc review in Bartlett v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reached the exact opposite conclusion in King v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
 Courts presume all language in a statute has meaning, and yet the interpretations offered by the IRS’s defenders — including Judge Edwards and those on the Fourth Circuit panel in King v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:59 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit released King v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:44 pm by Lee Tankle
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in King v. [read post]