Search for: "Kirk v Kirk" Results 221 - 240 of 739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
As if that weren’t enough excitement for one case, Kakarala also presents a third question, which the petition frames in the starkest terms imaginable: “Kirk . . . or Picard? [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” In one of the episodes of the original series, Captain Kirk, the captain of the U.S.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 pm by Kevin
Bushrod is known for, among other things, deciding Corfield v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:32 am by David DePaolo
And so on, down the workers' compensation food chain - anywhere a vendor touched an injured worker, or his file, the veil of exclusive remedy seemed to protect aberrant behavior.Then last week the California 4th District Court of Appeals said maybe, just maybe, exclusive remedy may not protect an employer's vendor.In King v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
Michael Reisman, Babel and BITs: Divergence Analysis and Authentication in the Unusual Decision of Kilic v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am by Zack Bluestone
Kirk explains that, “[w]hile making no compromises, Xi at least [has] made clear he really doesn’t want to see war breaking out. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 5:55 am by Joy Waltemath
The Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act (POWADA), S. 2180, would essentially reverse the Supreme Court’s Gross v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 1:12 pm by Jason Rantanen
He wishes to thank Bob Armitage and Mike Kirk for their excellent contributions to the paper. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:39 pm by Afro Leo
Aaron Wood, a well known IP lawyer in the UK, went about arguing that position on behalf of his client recently in the case of Atelier v Kilnworx (Atelier Eighty Two Limited v Kilnworx Climbing Centre CIC & Others [2015] EWHC 2291 (IPEC)). [read post]