Search for: "Koh v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2013, 9:52 pm
Patent No. 8,014,760 (missed telephone call management), a patent that the United States Patent and Trademark Office started to reexamine a couple of weeks ago. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:38 am
See Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am
Last week Judge Koh (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) denied a couple of Samsung motions that would, if granted, have delayed the limited Apple v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
On August 9, 2012, Judge Lucy Koh of the United... [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
See Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm
Today there will be a key hearing, styled as a "case management conference", before Judge Lucy Koh, relating to the first of two Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am
In late July the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a "final" (but not final-final) Office action rejecting all claims of the '915 patent. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
The WHDA US PTO Litigation Alert blog reports on the latest filings of reexamination requests with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and two of them involve hardware patents Apple has previously asserted in court against Samsung, Google's Motorola Mobility, and HTC. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 2:41 am
Between 1 AM and 2 AM local time on Sunday, Samsung's counsel in the intellectual property dispute with Apple notified the court of a "final" Office action by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejecting all claims of Apple's pinch-to-zoom API patent, U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:23 am
I guess the Oracle v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just given notice of a scheduling decision. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am
On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is scheduled to commence a limited damages retrial in the first Apple v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:03 am
That continues to be the posture in the case United States of America v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
Judge Lucy Koh is based in San Jose just like Judge Whyte. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am
Only in 2008, Koh made the following remarks in testimony before a Senate subcommittee: the Bush Administration has consistently asserted a constitutional theory of unfettered executive power, based on extraordinarily broad interpretations of Article II’s “Commander-in-Chief” Clause and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:19 am
That is the refrain found in 23 paragraphs of answers filed by Sotheby's and Decia Ruspoli di Poggio Suasa in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
If so, is this state of affairs desirable or does it require correction? [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:46 pm
At a case management conference held Monday afternoon local time, Judge Lucy Koh laid out a roadmap for resolving the post-trial issues in the first Apple v. [read post]
