Search for: "Kopel v. Kopel"
Results 221 - 240
of 327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
In Maples v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:59 am
Carpenter, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm
Burns v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
(David Kopel) So said the unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Reynolds Holding and Robert Cole describe Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
DAVE KOPEL: Will the Necessary & Proper clause save Obamacare? Not if the Court follows McCulloch v…
18 Nov 2011, 4:34 am
Not if the Court follows McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:33 pm
In Leader v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:09 pm
(David Kopel) The American Revolution took place because of various abuses of the rights of Americans by the British government. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:44 pm
The McDonald v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
As McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:08 pm
(David Kopel) Currently before the Illinois Supreme Court is People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
(David Kopel) Very early next year–in time for 2d semester classes in the 2011-12 academic year–Aspen Publishers will publish the first law school textbook on the the Second Amendment. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 5:32 pm
(David Kopel) That’s the question raised by a lawsuit in Colorado’s federal district court, in the case of Kerr v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:59 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm
Supreme Court in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
In addition to our series on Arizona v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:58 am
And briefly: At Volokh, David Kopel discusses Messerschmidt v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
(David Kopel) The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Millender v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
The title of this post captures a current blogosphere disagreement between Dave Kopel and Doug Berman regarding the interpretation of the Second Amendment in Ezell v. [read post]
