Search for: "LIBERTY CENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION" Results 221 - 240 of 659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2009, 7:53 pm
" The law, the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act â€â [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:33 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 60/214(b)(4) Along with counseling, the respondent in an Illinois order of protection case must surrender their guns to the Sheriff until the order of protection is lifted. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:52 pm by SO Issues
"It's going to be really, really hard, I think, to write something that will achieve the state's purpose in protecting children online but not be restrictive enough to be unconstitutional," said Carolyn Atwell-Davis, director of legislative affairs at the Virginia-based National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:08 pm by John Floyd
  Child Body-Slammed by Police Officer   On January 26, 2021, a resource officer at Liberty High School in Kissimmee, Florida, body-slammed a 16-year-old Black female student to the ground. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:32 pm by David Kravets
“We think that’s a very cumbersome process for consumers,” Christopher Calabrese, the legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a telephone interview. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 6:29 pm
After the initial success of Minnesota's Sex Offender Registration Act, the nation as a whole has worked to continuously improve a detailed, national registry of sex offenders, most notably as of late with the Adam Walsh Child Protection Act. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by SOIssues
Judge Mark Weaver ruled the ordinance unconstitutional in August following a 2008 challenge by the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm by MBettman
 Quarterman argues he has a liberty interest in the individualized treatment available in juvenile court. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff sued, claiming defendants violated his constitutional parental rights, and sought a temporary restraining order; but the court concluded that he lacked "a reasonable chance of success on the merits": In this case, Plaintiff asserts a liberty interest in "the care, custody, and control of" his child, which "is perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests" protected by the Due Process Clause. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:33 am
Nowhere will you see the words infant, baby, or child. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 5:54 am by Eugene Volokh
The starting point is that these constitutionally protected "right[s] and liberty interest[s] necessarily exist coterminously, and jointly, in two people—the child's mother and the child's father. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:58 pm by Valarie Kaur
Barbara van Schewick, Professor of Law and Director of Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society: “The future of the open Internet in Europe is on the line. [read post]
Indeed, the American Civil Liberties Union recently filed a lawsuit arguing that every child should receive legal representation in these hearings. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by Ray Mullman
Does the jury system and its protections mean that sometimes the guilty will go free? [read post]
17 May 2007, 2:02 pm by Copper Cursive
The complaint charges that U.S. courts are failing to protect the life, liberties, security, and other human rights of abused mothers and children by frequently awarding child custody to abusers and child molesters. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 3:23 am by SHG
Yesterday, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “Year in Hate and Extremism 2022” report added parental-rights groups to its “Hate and Anti-Government groups Map,” including multiple chapters of Moms for Liberty, alongside neo-Nazis. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
” The PROTECT Act was the successor statute to the 1996 Child Pornography Prevention Act, which the Court struck down in Free Speech Coalition v Ashcroft (2002.) [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:49 am
Last fall, the Southern Center for Human Rights and the American Civil Liberties Union asked a court to prevent nine elderly and severely disabled offenders who lived within 1,000 feet of a church from being evicted. [read post]