Search for: "Lacking v. State of Mississippi" Results 221 - 240 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
If the federal court plaintiffs lack standing or a cause of action, or if the Court holds that state court judges are not proper party-defendants, or that for injunctive relief to be effective it must--but is not permitted to--run against private non-parties, then the Texas law will remain in effect pending resolution in state court and a possible eventual return to the US Supreme Court posing the question whether a six-week ban is permissible on the merits.For the U.S.… [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:53 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Stay tuned over the next year as we share more stories about the current state of indigent defense, fifty years after Gideon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am by Zahavah Levine, Thea Raymond-Sidel
Signature Matching Lacks Uniform Standards Lawsuits challenging the verification process itself typically allege that the state lacks uniform standards or criteria for matching ballot signatures to signatures on record. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 2:03 pm by Dan
However, five states continued the practice: Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Virginia. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
Hawaii and Mississippi make carrier misconduct redressable in tort.Texas used to permit bad faith actions until the Supreme Court's decision in Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
In light of states’ differing responses to the Wayfair v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
In that trial, Flowers was convicted, and the Mississippi Supreme Court upheld his conviction, turning away his claim under Batson v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]