Search for: "Lang, in Re"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2019, 2:56 pm
Zoraik’s journey to re-establish himself as a member of the bar. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Epstein, Andrea Gede-Lange, Matthew V. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
David Bergenfeld Laura Lang This past year was a very eventful one in the world of fidelity bond, commercial crime, and cybercrime coverages. [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:10 am
Thereafter, In re Swanson and In re Trans Texas Holdings explored topics such as issue preclusion and the appropriate threshold for granting an ex parte patent reexamination. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:15 am
Cir. 1996) as well as In re Portola Packaging Inc., 110 F.3d 786, 42 USPQ2d 1295 (Fed. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 2:52 pm
Lang. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:30 pm
The holding in Fresenius II was a bit more controversial that In re Baxter (given recent cases like In re Construction Equipment). [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:10 am
In granting the stay the court explained: (here) as the plaintiffs state, the standard for the PTO’s granting an inter partes review under AIA is higher than the standard for the former re-examination [A]s the plaintiffs state, the standard for the PTO’s granting an inter partes review under AIA is higher than the standard for the former re-examination . . .In sum, the likelihood of inter partes review appears lower than the earlier likelihood of… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:10 am
(In re Staats, decision here). [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
IN RE AVID IDENTIFICATION 2 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:10 am
In re Hengehold,440 F.2d 1395, 1403 (CCPA 1971). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:10 am
Indeed, as demonstrated a few weeks back (In Re Construction Equipment, CAFC (2011)), the ultimate outcome of the ex parte reexamination can even effectively reverse an earlier decision of the CAFC. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:10 am
So, it will be interesting to see if the first litigation is re-started. [read post]
Three Strikes, You’re Out!? Apotex’s Latest Attempt to Invalidate the PLAVIX® Patent Denied by USPTO
9 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
You’re Out!? [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 3:55 am
Earlier this week, the agency was reversed again, due to the guidance of the patent specification in In re Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:15 am
In reversing the decision of the CAFC, the case was remanded with instructions to consider a re-calibrated standard. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:10 am
In re Doyle, 293 F.3d 1355, 1359 (Fed. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 8:55 am
"They're fighting for their families, not a cause. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 5:26 pm
In April, he appeared on Norman Corwin’s network radio show, ‘The Pursuit of Happiness’ (which had featured [Paul] Robeson’s ‘Ballad for Americans’), singing ‘Do Re Mi. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 11:34 am
Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
