Search for: "Laurence Little" Results 221 - 240 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
In November 1973, Professor Laurence Tribe authored a review of the Court’s 1972 term in the Harvard Law Review and devoted a considerable number of pages to analysis of Roe. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 12:23 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
” David BrophyIn practice, because the latter part of this instruction appears to say “don’t worry about whether the starting point really is ‘closest’ or not”, opposition divisions have often given little weight to arguments that a document was not in fact the closest prior art. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:57 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
There is little evidence of a ‘continuous improvement culture’ in the Office.These are the most important conclusions of ‘Your voice, our future: The EPO Staff Engagement Survey’. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 2:45 am by jonathanturley
” Harvard Professor Laurence Tribe declared that an order to appoint a special master to review the documents is analogous to the Dred Scott decision as an abuse of judicial power. [read post]
The Court held that the rule was that an applicant had to clearly make out its case in the documents tendered, and instead, the Appellant’s averments in its founding affidavit were little more than a recitation of the words of the Section and not a statement of facts from which a legal conclusion could be drawn. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:28 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
In particular, the quasi-judicial function of the Boards of Appeal in patent disputes has received only little attention. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:57 pm by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
As this contribution is a little Latin-heavy anyway, let me add that this is of course not a new idea; I borrowed it from the medieval Gesta Romanorum: Quidquid agis, prudenter agas et respice finem. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Prosecutors are a little different in that they can choose not to secure an indictment. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
The addition of these reminders to the Guidelines for Examination is a little curious given that, as a rule, the EPO initially examines only the formal conditions for claiming priority. 4. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by jonathanturley
Reid said that Cannon is little more than an extension of Trump like other possessions stolen by the former president. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:15 am by Jordan Steiker
Ultimately, the oral argument seemed to shed little light. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:26 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Just look it up: 7% of the state budget for healthcare (€73 billion for 2017).There is little understanding of each other’s point of view. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
In this case, as in so many capital cases, the imposition of a death sentence had little do with fairness. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 7:16 pm by Hui Zhang
There is a suggestion to remove this provision, as it has little demand and is unnecessary from practice, and it disobeys the principle of autonomy of will in private law, which may cause the authority to intervene follow-up matters derived from open licensing. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by cornellvermontlaw
” Surprisingly little exists in law journals explaining the public debt clause. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 6:49 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
There is little doubt that a company who is not free to exploit, because third-party patents reserve the use of certain techniques, will invest in acquiring such capacities. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:33 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Numerous changes to the internal means of appeal have been introduced (…) The completely intransparent selection procedure and the unilateral appointment resulted in staff having little to no confidence in the internal appeals system, in the opinions delivered by the internal Appeals Committee and the decisions based thereupon. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am by jonathanturley
There was little discussion of the prior hysteria or attacks on the integrity of the conservative justices. [read post]