Search for: "Law v. Phillips"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 11:38 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate The California Supreme Court released its opinion today in California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:07 am
The Judge provided a short and helpful summary of the law relating to privacy injunctions ([13-19]). [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
The two that will probably be most glaring omissions are the Federal Circuit's decision in Vanda Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 7:03 pm
Courtney Phillips. [read post]
7 May 2007, 5:06 am
That's what the Second Department held on May 1st in Matter of Phillips v Weiboldt, 2007 NY Slip Op 03931. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
I think that it's hard to make much of these statements by themselves; they simply reflect the Court's holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm
On 27 July, amidst the traditional flurry of judgments handed down at the end of the Trinity term, a 7 strong Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Hope, Walker, Hale, Mance, Collins and Clarke) gave its ruling in the Belmont Park case, concerning the applicability of the principle of the common law on insolvency known as the ”anti-deprivation rule”. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Spivack v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Spivack v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am
The appeal is due to be heard by Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:43 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2020-2021update.html A petition for certiorari was filed in one case on 5/28/21:Phillips, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am
But yesterday brought us an administrative law undercard: argument in PDR Network v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 1:41 pm
By: Phillip J. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
Here is the abstract: Moore v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
For the full background on the relevant law in this area, see the case preview here. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
For the full background on the relevant law in this area, see the case preview here. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:59 am
More on the 1987 Supreme Court ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:40 am
Jean Phillips at the Defender Project won in State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:56 pm
Interestingly, although that attorney lists her address with the State Bar (and on the docket sheet) as the address for Phillips Jessner (a family law firm in downtown L.A.), that lawyer doesn't appear on the firm's web site. [read post]
