Search for: "Lax v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
Larkin v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
” Severability of a state law or regulation is a question of state law. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:54 am
If you are a victim of fraud, please contact Lax & Neville LLP today at (212) 696-1999 to schedule a consultation. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:13 am
Reporters stated that Broward is far more lax in its disciplinary and enforcement policies than even Palm Beach or Miami-Dade counties. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
See Indictment ¶ 1, ECF No. 7.At trial, the Government seeks to introduce evidence discovered during a forensic examination of Hassanshahi's laptop computer, which the Government seized from Hassanshahi in January 2012 upon his arrival from the United States at the Los Angeles International Airport (`LAX’). [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm
On the facts, this was not a good case for Cox; the record quite clearly showed that Cox was calculatedly lax in its enforcement of its repeat infringer policy, hanging on to violators for the stated purpose of preserving revenue. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
By Ryan Graham The Third Circuit’s recent ruling in FTC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
In 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruling in FTC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:35 am
Lax, Esq. or Sandra P. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Another recent example is BCCA Appeal Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 12:09 pm
Maybe lax is putting it mildly. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
David Davis MP, Tom Watson MP and Others v the Secretary of State for the Home Department Today, the High Court found against the Government in David Davis’s and Tom Watson’s joint legal challenge to the Government’s emergency surveillance legislation. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm
It was so bad, he stated he did not want any more chemo if this was what he had to look forward to every time. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:31 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
United States (7-2 per Roberts). [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
Bouaphakeo v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 6:23 am
It found no merit to the employer’s argument (premised on Justice White’s concurrence in Eastex v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
On May 18, 2015, The Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”) reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ (“9th Circuit”) ruling in Tibble et al. v. [read post]
