Search for: "Leahy v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision relating to the intersection between trade secret law and patent law: Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
V. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:55 am
: Firehouse Restaurant Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
[2] Markman v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
The changes further made the novelty defeating acts available wherever they occur in the world, thereby removing requirements related to occurrences in the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Now, only the United States may sue for statutory damages.A new private suit provision (35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
(The IP Factor) Japan Japan to sign ACTA this weekend (Michael Geist) Poland A letter of consent and something more (Class 46) South East Asia Patent protection in the ASEAN region (Foreign Filing Blog) Switzerland Acquiescence not a factor in opposition proceedings (Class 46) United Kingdom Copyright in court judgments: a matter of access (1709 Copyright Blog) SuperGroup: Fashion, recession and IP (IPKat) Damages cap now in place (PatLit) PCC Page 39: The… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to any application for extension of a patent term under section 156 of title 35, United States Code, that is pending on, that is filed after, or as to which a decision regarding the application is subject to judicial review on, the date of the enactment of this Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(Class 46) United States US General Can the ITC keep pace? [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Cubatabaco v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 pm
The Leahy-Smith AIA refers directly to harmonization only once and only in an aspirational “sense of Congress” provision that reads as follows: Sense of Congress - It is the sense of the Congress that converting the United States patent system from ‘first to invent’ to a system of ‘first inventor to file’ will improve the United States patent system and promote harmonization of the United… [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
Smith (R-TX) on March 30, 2011, the first significant change to the United States patent system has arrived. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:33 am
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) and United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
Arguably, the United States Patent Office has been given new tasks and, even with the open questions about fee diversion, greater authority. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(IAM) United Kingdom EWHC (Admin) holds defendant’s acquisition of illegally copied audio files would constitute an offence under s. 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Sitek v Circuit Court of Swidnica (1709 Copyright Blog) IPO – Original Bucks Fizz members lose trade mark battle over name (Out-Law) (IPKat) Should the UK facilitate online filing of registered design applications? [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:40 pm
” The United States switches from a “first to invent” jurisdiction to a “first to file” jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:38 am
” In comparison, the EDNY reached the opposite conclusion (In the Matter of an Application of the United States of America for an Order Authorizing the Release of Historical Cell-Site Information, 10-MC-897 (NGG)). [read post]
