Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers"
Results 221 - 240
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2021, 5:52 pm
Had the Modernization Act been law at the time, I might not have burned shoe leather trying to locate the owner. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:40 pm
,Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:39 pm
The clearest example of this difference is the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
N.D. Cal. Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme Cases–Viral DRM v. YouTube Schedule A Defendants
21 Jan 2024, 8:13 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 1:46 am
" The complaint asserts that the Defendant "has copied the design and trade dress of the entire "upper" of each of these shoes, including the unique shape of the leather on the inside and outside of the shoe . . . the iconic lacing with exterior webbing on the shoe upper . . . the sunburst design . . . and the unique shape of the leather on the inside and outside of the shoe upper…" The case is titled Nike,… [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:40 am
In the new decision of Otter Producs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:16 pm
Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
In the Kings County (Brooklyn) Criminal Court case of People. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:22 am
Leather Mfg. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 11:40 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
General Electric Co., 272 U.S. 476 (1926) had been overruled by a recent decision of the Supreme Court, Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 7:30 pm
Note the SCOTUSBlog notes the Court also granted cert in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Wiggins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
YouTube Schedule A Defendants A Judge Enumerates a SAD Scheme Plaintiff’s Multiple Abuses, But Still Won’t Award Sanctions–Jiangsu Huari Webbing Leather v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
See Leake v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
A basic leather Birkin retails for about $10,000, while those made from exotic leathers such as ostrich, lizard, or crocodile and limited edition releases can retail for over $200,000.[5] Image: An Hermés Birkin bag. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:20 am
In Busick v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:50 am
The IPKat's eagle eye spotted Lunan Group Ltd v Edwin Co Ltd, which was lurking on LexisNexis Butterworth's subscription service. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Helms v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:36 pm
” Legal Times reports that in response to Senator Kohl’s questions about recent Supreme Court antitrust activity, including Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
