Search for: "Lee v. Brown*" Results 221 - 240 of 608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
Lee, observing that although Lee’s case was not a capital case, the Court’s decision also “has important implications for capital cases. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 April 2016. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 April 2016. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am by Anthony Fairclough
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 April 2016. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 April 2016. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 26 April it will hear the appeal of Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice whether the recall of the appellant to hospital under the Mental Health Act 1983, s 42(3), was unlawful and should entitle him to relief, because he was not given adequate reasons at the time the recall warrant was executed, nor within 72 hours. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:48 am by David Russcol
Since 2007, and especially after the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:48 am by David Russcol
Since 2007, and especially after the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:05 pm by Kevin
State, 86 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (flimsy hollow plastic broomstick not a “deadly weapon”); Lee v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Lee, 15-446, presenting two questions about review of decisions rendered by the Patent and Trial Appeal Board; Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Justin Moongyu Lee; Rebecca Taewon Lee; Thomas Edward Kent; American Immigrant Investment Fund I, LLC; Biofuel Venture IV, LLC; Biofuel Venture V, LLC; Nexland, Inc., dba Nexland Investment Group; and Nexsun Ethanol, LLC Case number: 14-cv-06865 (United States District Court for the Central District of California) Case filed: September 3, 2014 Qualifying Judgment/Order: October 29, 2015 11/30/2015 2/28/2016 2015-129 In the Matter of Blackstone Management Partners… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Lee, 15-446, would interest only Kooks: The case presents two specialized questions involving the standards applied by the Patent and Trial Appeal Board (PTAB) in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings and whether a court of appeals can review the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR proceeding. [read post]