Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure" Results 221 - 240 of 672
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by SHG
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
The respondent, Mrs Arnold, was the freehold owner of the leisure park and the lessor of the above leases (the lessor). [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
 Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] –  Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike packaging | Parasite copying | 3D printing | Labouring the point? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:03 am by John Jascob
The plaintiff’s decision to wait until after a related action failed in Minnesota before bringing suit in “a rather leisurely fashion” in Delaware was unreasonable and caused the defendants prejudice in defending the suit and pursuing indemnification rights (Houseman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:19 am by GSU Law Student
Without leisure you might, like V, the eponymous hero of V for Vendetta, become too fixed on just one goal. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(Note there is some oversimplification below; for instance, the rules are different when the defender is actually the initial aggressor, for instance if D attacks V, V fights back, and then D kills V in “self-defense. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There is still a tension between the ruling of the House of Lords (as it then was) in Campbell v MGN and the subsequent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Von Hannover v Germany. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:37 am by Afro Leo
The case is Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54 (24 June 2015) . [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Articled clerks could go hungry ...Life in IP was much more leisurely in the 1970s than it is now, and not just because when you’d sent a letter you knew you had some breathing space before the answer came back. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Dreamland Leisure, [2015] EWHC 2556 (Banksy judgment). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu, a General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) decision going back to 7 July, is one of those decisions that has been sitting in this Kat's in-tray for far too long. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:52 am by SHG
In a twit yesterday, the holding in Mock v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:08 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The appellant has learning difficulties and behavioural problems and as a result the respondent Council are statutorily required to secure access for him to sufficient educational and recreational leisure-time activities for the improvement of his well-being. [read post]