Search for: "Little v. Jacobs"
Results 221 - 240
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 10:12 am
In the years after Berman v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Fortunately this particular matter has been considered and largely rejected by the UK courts (see Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWHC/Ch/25 ) As mentioned, there is quite a bit of case law on the public interest issue, and those interested in it may find it helpful to read a summary by Jacob J(as he then was) in his first instance hearing of Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland case (see paras [24-34]). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
(Ilya Somin) Today is the fifth anniversary of Kelo v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:15 am
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:30 pm
Jacob, 2012 N.Y. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
If so, the needs of plaintiffs -- who make the decision to go to court -- and defendants, who have little option to go when sued, may reflect different points of view. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
Quoting its 1978 opinion in TVA v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Ladd v Marshall [1954 EWCA Civ 1; MMI Research v Cellxion [2012] EWCA Civ 7).Brian also reminded the audience of the three categories of amendments recognised by Jacob LJ in Nikken v Pioneer [2005] EWCA Civ 906:(a) before a trial; (b) after trial, at which certain claims have been held valid but other claims held invalid, the patentee simply wishing to delete the invalid claims (I would include here also the case where the patentee wishes to re-write the claims so… [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
” The Illinois Appellate Court opinion written by Justice Cunningham, cited Jacobs v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:05 am
A year earlier, Jacob Broches Aronoff wrote in the St. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser explains why Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
Nowadays, things seem to have calmed down a little bit, with a handful of key decisions in 2013 to digest. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Luen Fat Metal and Plastic Manufactory Limited v Jacobs & Turner Limited t/a Trespass [2019] EWHC 118.BackgroundThe Claimant owns:a series of 3 UK word marks: FUNTIME, FUN TIME, and FUN-TIME in respect of “Class 28: Games, toys and playthings; electronic games”.an EU trade mark for the word FUNTIME for the same goods in class 28. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Compared to other areas of social services such as medicine or education, we have comparatively little empirical data about justice issues, their social or financial impacts, or how to avoid or best deal with them. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
Mermeren v Fox. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
He queries: "What about a second appeal by me to the House of Lords following the precedent set by Buttes Gas v Hammer [1982] AC 888 (see here), with the House of Lords granting me leave to appeal and then choosing to follow the European Patent Officeapproach (particularly now that the Technical Appeal Board has asserted in T 154/04 has asserted, in robust terms, their view that Jacob LJ was quite wrong, and given detail as to how they think he got it so wrong)? [read post]
