Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 221 - 240 of 39,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 11:47 am
  Second, because of point number 1 we tend to find the issue a little dull. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:07 pm by LTA-Editor
By Miriam Swedlow Despite overruling the Federal Circuit’s prior practice of reviewing all aspects of patent claim construction de novo, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:13 am
  As detailed here at SCOTUSblog, Tuesday afternoon the Supreme Court will hear argument in Oregon v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm by familoo
This is particularly so in light of a recent judgment from the Court of Appeal on the potential for a claim in negligence against a professional offering advice, see Burgess & Anor v Lejonvarn [2016] EWHC 40 (TCC) (15 January 2016) where Alexander Nissen QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) held : In conclusion, it is established that in law a duty of care extends to the protection against economic loss in respect of both advice and any service in which a… [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 11:37 pm by Steve Baird
Anyway, it’s been a little while since our last AlphaWatch Alert, so there you go. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:46 am by Tom Smith
Wednesday, in a 7-2 ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the exemption in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:46 am by Brian Cordery
The patent in issue was previously litigated in Schlumberger v EMGS. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:43 am
 Mensah (trading as 37 Days 3 Hours 9 Minutes Creative) v Darroch & Others [2014] EWHC 692 (QB) is such a case, this being a 19 March 2014 ruling from Mr Justice Tugendhat, sitting in the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]