Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 221 - 240
of 603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
In a rather long decision, the Court made some important and potentially far reaching statements regarding the requirements to prove acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
Arnold v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
” – the court has provided guidance on the relevance of this issue to the question of “outstanding benefit” in the long running dispute of Shanks v Unilever PLC and others [2017] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Given that the Court of Appeal in this case reached its decision in favour of Mr Wood with reference to the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in (Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36), which held (in brief) that business common sense only had a part to play where the meaning of a term is ambiguous, how the Court’s decision in this case aligns with its recent decision in Arnold will be of keen interest to contract lawyers and litigators alike. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
As an aside, I should note that this is a long blog post because the opinion is, as lawyers say, very “fact-specific”, i.e., there are a lot of issues of fact that came up in the case. [read post]
Seventh Circuit Declines To Address The EEOC’s Challenge To The Legality Of Employer’s Wellness Plan
29 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
” In EEOC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:10 am
In the case, Long v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Long v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Long v. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
E.g., Frio v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:19 pm
Schweitzer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
Arnold v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 1:02 am
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in SEC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:31 pm
And in early December, Justice Woolford dismissed the long-running case of Wu v Moncur. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:32 am
In the case, Long v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:32 am
In the case, Long v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
Any appellate lawyer will tell you that they are a long-shot. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm
Asked why the process took so long compared with other agreements, Nathan Arnold, Director for Media Affairs at the State Department's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, declined to comment. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
