Search for: "Long v. Secretary, Department of Corrections" Results 221 - 240 of 391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 1:53 am by INFORRM
 At its core, fairness requires the individual who would be affected by a decision to have the right to know of and address the matters that might be held against him before the decision-maker makes his decision (R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Hickey (No 2)). [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:28 am by Guest Author
When the First Congress established the Departments of Foreign Affairs and War in 1789, it gave both departments a “chief clerk,” who was to be “employed” within each department as an “inferior officer” as the secretary of each department was to “deem proper. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Energy Department Secretary Jennifer M. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 5:54 am by Paras Shah
As the Supreme Court’s opinion last term in Trump v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Trucios-Haynes observed in the Georgetown Immigration Law Journal that applying the Supreme Court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence to long-standing immigration laws “is particularly awkward. [read post]
On December 21, 2020, Congress passed a long-anticipated additional round of COVID relief legislation as part of the Bipartisan-Bicameral Omnibus COVID Relief Deal. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am by Scott R. Anderson
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
In addition, the Supreme Court may give its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case, Lachaux v Independent Print (heard on 13 and 14 November 2018) this term. [read post]